Billionaire Chamath Palihapitiya suggests that Northeast cities like NYC and Boston are hemorrhaging income due to political ideology — all while the South keeps booming

With a single tweet, Chamath Palihapitiya, the CEO of Social Capital, recently became the provocative main character of the day on X, formerly known as Twitter.

Palihapitiya sent out a screenshot of a Bloomberg article based on how six southern states had contributed more to U.S. gross domestic product than the northeast corridor of Washington-New York-Boston for the first time in history.

Don’t miss

But it was his accompanying caption that sparked hot debate: “Go woke, go broke,” he said, implying that the ongoing culture war and economic policies of northeastern states had facilitated the migration of wealth and economic power to the South.

While tweeps weighed in with their own thoughts — including fellow billionaire Mark Cuban — here’s what the numbers show is really going on.

Wealth migration taking place

Bloomberg’s analysis of data from the IRS highlights the southern wealth migration. Florida, Texas, Georgia, the Carolinas and Tennessee collectively added $100 billion in new net income from 2020 to 2021.

Meanwhile, the Washington, New York and Boston corridor lost $60 billion in income in that same period.

That marks the first time the tax agency has seen this type of reversal since it started collecting this data in the 1990s.

Bloomberg attributes the shift to a “flood of transplants.” Out of the 15 fastest-growing cities, 10 of them are in the southeast corridor, according to Census Bureau data. Some of that growth is likely attributable to a number of corporations moving their headquarters from the Northeast to the South, bringing with them a tremendous number of jobs.

Story continues

And it doesn’t hurt that residents will experience “warmer weather, lower taxes, looser regulation and cheaper housing” in the South, as Bloomberg points out.

Read more: Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now use $100 to cash in on prime real estate — without the headache of being a landlord. Here’s how

But what about the ‘woke’ issue?

Palihapitiya argued there’s a cultural lawyer to the debate. He claims “woke” policies were also a driving factor in the migration.

“Is the major differences between these two groups only ideology? Or is it something else like genetics, health, etc etc that I’m not understanding?” he asked his followers on X.

Several of those followers on the app agreed with Palihapitiya’s conclusion, with one noteworthy exception: billionaire Mark Cuban.

“Name me one woke company that has gone broke,” Cuban replied to Palihapitiya.

Palihapitiya took Cuban up on his challenge, responding with a list of all startups that had gone bankrupt in recent years and said some were likely to be “woke,” but Cuban wasn’t satisfied: “A list of STARTUPS failing is weak and you know it Chamath.”

Cuban, a self-described independent, arguably has some skin in the game, as his latest venture — Cost Plus Drugs, which aims to lower drug prices for Americans — is arguably a “woke” corporation. Launched in 2022, the company delivers over 100 generic medicines across all 50 U.S. states with a simple pricing structure: costs plus 15% markup, a $3 pharmacy service fee and a $5 shipping fee.

Where does that leave the debate?

As further data comes in, the debate over America’s ongoing migration rates is sure to rage on.

The Census data Palihapitiya cited was based on 2020-2021 statistics, when remote work and pandemic lockdowns were at a peak. That saw a number of office workers fleeing expensive cities to find more space and affordable living elsewhere.

As that trend has begun to recede in the Northeast, it’s possible more recent data could tell a different story. For instance, New York’s population grew last year while it added enough jobs to push the unemployment rate below 4%.

Either way, when that data eventually comes out, it’s safe to say Palihapitiya and Cuban will both be eager to see if it backs up their assertions or not.

What to read next

This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.